Posted by Wuss on 05/04
When I had a char that could either choose to headbutt or stun, I
went for headbutt, since headbutt baits tend to flee a lot to risk
wasting mana in the air.
Backlash seems far more likely at lower mind (even with 25 mind diff)
whereas at higher minds it seems to be quite negligible even with just
a 10 mind diff. Headbutts, when they fail, they fail without rhyme or
reason. Surges are annoying, but never in a pk battle have enough
surges happened to win me a fight, tho a lot of times there were plenty
of wfw's to lose me the fight.
Wuss
From: Tyrion
Tuesday, May 04, 10:16PM
Well lets see.......
People complain bash is too powerful when they have no Str
People complain Headbutt is too powerful when they have no Con
People complain Stun is too powerful when they have no Mind
Seems rather silly to be always complaining about it when those
dong teh complaining are almost always those that are VERY
vulnerable to whichever special they are complaining about.
Having that said though I personally think that WFW stuns do last
a little bit too much on the long side, a length somewhere
in the 2 -31/2 round range probably about as long as they should
last in any Pkill fight.
Tyrion
From: Ghandi
Tuesday, May 04, 11:14PM
Actually, I brought stun up this time and have the mind to
wfw and the con to headbutt. I'm after balance, not after
making my character better.
Anyway, I already said what I feel should fix the imbalance
in an earlier post. Wfw's shouldn't last longer than a
staggering headbutt, should cost less, not be tumbled so
easy if at all and shouldn't surge. Hmm, pretty much
how it used to be.. As if it's gonna change back. -flop-
| 