Posted by Tritoch on 12/17
Two things that would make glance cooler, if you just saw the persons
condition not thier fulldesc...if I wanna see that ill just you look..
and, if it didnt echo to the person that you glanced at them, whats the
point of glancing at them to see if someone is low before you jump them
if they catch wind and run? just makes ya wanna stun first and ask
questions later...
From: Nobyar
Sunday, December 16 2001, 09:45PM
yeah not letting somone see you glanced at them is much cooler.
change that. Good Idea Tritoch
From: Tirzah
Sunday, December 16 2001, 09:50PM
I use glance when I want to see someone's desc without seeing all
their multi-colored strings or having to scroll back past their
eq. So if glance is changed, can we have some command where we
can look at someone's desc without seeing their eq?
Tirzah
From: Donelan
Monday, December 17 2001, 06:53AM
My suggestions:
1. Use glance to see condition.
2. Use look to see condition and desc.
3. Use examine to see condition, desc and eq (you're taking the time
to note every single piece of eq they're wearing -- that sounds like
an examination to me).
From: Donelan
Monday, December 17 2001, 08:03PM
Oh, I also suggest that peek only work when you examine someone.
Glance never echoes to the target, look echos with high enough
perception and examine always echoes.
Certainly you can determine if someone is near death or healthy
out of the corner of your eye. Glance shouldn't echo to make it
useful in pk -- and it's plausible as well.
From: Chaykin
Monday, December 17 2001, 09:06PM
I agree that glance shouldn't echo to the target. Maybe somebody with high
perc ought to be able to see when people glance at him/her, but otherwise,
it would be really nice in pkill to have a way to see somebody's condition
without their knowing...especially the good guys who want the element of
surprise but balk at attacking someone who's hurt!
Chay
|
