Posted by Akai_Hayate on 10/26
How about a level 40 minimum req for AA, this would bring the bubbling
couldron of rage that is fillen in me, everytime I see 4 level 20 aas
on, down to a mere simmering vial of hate. And it would totally fix the
problem of low level surgeons.
From: Darky
Wednesday, October 24 2001, 06:39PM
I don't agree with akai often, but for once
this shining genius of a idea really got to me
that is the best thing he's ever said! EVER!
honestly! -beam akai-
From: Rikimaru
Thursday, October 25 2001, 11:41AM
but wouldn't that be so un-old stylish, besides
worrying about low level surgeons is why you keep
low level friends =D
From: Rudolf
Thursday, October 25 2001, 02:24PM
Why not just reserve AA for level 50? That's what the result would be.
Why should anyone turn on AA at level 40? There are no other AA below
them, only AA above them. For their own protection, people would
think twice before doing this.
From: Sasha
Thursday, October 25 2001, 05:06PM
if you're worried about low level healers, you might make healing
bound by the 10 level restriction.
From: Akai_Hayate
Friday, October 26 2001, 12:49PM
Let me explain, level 40 req because my AA mage is level 46, and I dont
want to level him, level 40 req not just 10 level range for healing
because, if the 40 req didnt happen, the level limit on healing would just
screw pk over even more, its gotta be all or nothing, you cant imp the bad
part and leave out the good part, then say, why are you crying?
plus, i have a level 32 aa surgeon :P
| 